HostGOHM vs THREE — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs THREE (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GOHM vs THREE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GOHM | THREE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.53K | $0.0007895 |
| Market cap | — | $877.86K |
| 24h volume | $3.54K | $70.36K |
| Liquidity | $116.22K | $114.19K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $877.86K |
| Holders | 7,457 | 15,325 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- THREE measures ~20× the 24h volume of GOHM
- THREE measures ~2.1× the holder count of GOHM
- over the shared window GOHM moved +1.00% while THREE moved +15.7%
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
THREE
THREE — three.ws on Solana, mint FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump — is a pump.fun graduate holding $878 thousand across 15,325 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with its community organized around the three.ws domain and an X community page.
The book is livelier than its size-class peers: ~$116 thousand of daily volume against $114 thousand of liquidity is over 100% daily turnover — a market still actively trading the token rather than holding it. At ~$58 of cap per wallet the file is wide and retail.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or THREE?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and THREE (Solana) measures $877.86K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or THREE?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and THREE (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and THREE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GOHM at +1.00% and THREE at +15.7%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMFAPCOIN vs THREETHREE vs AAVEKOHAI vs THREEXERIS vs THREE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.