HostGOHM vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GOHM vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GOHM | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.53K | $14.30 |
| Market cap | — | $10.70B |
| 24h volume | $3.54K | $13.36K |
| Liquidity | $116.22K | $94.21K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $5.23M |
| Holders | 7,457 | 13,082 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of GOHM
- LINK.E measures ~1.8× the holder count of GOHM
- over the shared window GOHM moved +1.00% while LINK.E moved +10.2%
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $94.2 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.70B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GOHM at +1.00% and LINK.E at +10.2%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMLINK.E vs KMSNX vs LINK.ELINK.E vs LDOSURGE vs LINK.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.