HostGOHM vs FAPCOIN — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs FAPCOIN (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GOHM vs FAPCOIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| GOHM | FAPCOIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.53K | $0.002885 |
| Market cap | — | $2.78M |
| 24h volume | $3.54K | $16.90K |
| Liquidity | $116.22K | $114.42K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $2.78M |
| Holders | 7,457 | 5,777 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FAPCOIN measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of GOHM
- over the shared window GOHM moved +1.00% while FAPCOIN moved −13.1%
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
FAPCOIN
FAPCOIN on Solana — mint 8vGr1eX9vfpootWiUPYa5kYoGx9bTuRy2Xc4dNMrpump — is a crude-humor token with an explicit community-takeover story: its handle is fapcoin_cto — a CTO (community takeover) branded token where the community runs the account after the original deployer left. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $2.8 million across 5,777 holders.
The numbers are the strongest in this batch: ~$67 thousand of daily volume on $114 thousand — a 0.7x turnover, a genuinely active book — and ~$422 of cap per wallet, a mid-tier distribution. Mint and freeze revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or FAPCOIN?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and FAPCOIN (Solana) measures $2.78M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or FAPCOIN?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and FAPCOIN (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and FAPCOIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show GOHM at +1.00% and FAPCOIN at −13.1%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMFAPCOIN vs THREEFAPCOIN vs AAVEKOHAI vs FAPCOINXERIS vs FAPCOIN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.