HostFLUID vs NEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
FLUID (Ethereum) vs NEAR (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
FLUID vs NEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| FLUID | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $4.87 |
| Market cap | $119.01M | $15.74M |
| 24h volume | $3.11M | $995.23K |
| Liquidity | $474.84K | $420.92K |
| FDV | $142.19M | $15.78M |
| Holders | 11,748 | 14,552 |
| Age (days) | 1,699 | 904 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FLUID measures ~7.6× the market cap of NEAR
- FLUID measures ~3.1× the 24h volume of NEAR
- over the shared window FLUID moved +6.93% while NEAR moved +15.9%
What the data says
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLUID or NEAR?
By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures $119.01M and NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLUID or NEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and NEAR (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLUID and NEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show FLUID at +6.93% and NEAR at +15.9%.
More comparisons
AUDIO vs FLUIDARX vs FLUIDFLUID vs CHIPFLUID vs METACNEAR vs PRLNEAR vs HIMSNEAR vs CRVNEAR vs SUPER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.