HostFLING vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
FLING vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| FLING | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002659 | $0.0002294 |
| Market cap | — | $159.06K |
| 24h volume | $11.27K | $984.90 |
| Liquidity | $24.35K | $17.43K |
| FDV | $247.66K | $159.06K |
| Holders | 496 | 3,228 |
| Age (days) | 10 | 291 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~11× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- SHRAMP measures ~6.5× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window FLING moved +18.3% while SHRAMP moved +44.2%
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $24 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades C and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show FLING at +18.3% and SHRAMP at +44.2%.
More comparisons
FLING vs STOICFLING vs CATWIFFLING vs RIZZLUCIA vs FLINGSHRAMP vs LENNYRMDN vs SHRAMPARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.