HostFBTC vs GHO — price, size and safety, side by side
FBTC (Solana) vs GHO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
FBTC vs GHO — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| FBTC | GHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.83K | $0.9996 |
| Market cap | $12.51M | $697.96M |
| 24h volume | — | $1.72M |
| Liquidity | $1.66M | $26.48M |
| FDV | $12.51M | $697.96M |
| Holders | 42 | 8,133 |
| Age (days) | — | 368 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GHO measures ~56× the market cap of FBTC
- GHO measures ~16× the liquidity of FBTC
- GHO measures ~194× the holder count of FBTC
- over the shared window FBTC moved +9.45% while GHO moved +0.16%
What the data says
FBTC
FBTC is FunctionBTC — a Bitcoin yield asset in the "BTC that earns" class alongside LBTC and the liquid-staking tokens, issued under Function's structure for putting Bitcoin into yield-bearing deployment. The mint 3orqhCKM5admbcHkHQhRAEKbXhUT5VPgsQqz7fBa6QdF is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.7 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest note for the class: every "productive BTC" claim is a custody decision — the yield source varies (staking, lending, delta-neutral strategies) but the holder always sits behind at least one operator's reserve management. FBTC's A grade covers the Solana-side mint; the yield engine is an off-chain book.
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $26.5 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FBTC or GHO?
By tracked market cap: FBTC (Solana) measures $12.51M and GHO (Ethereum) measures $697.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FBTC or GHO?
On the contract checks we publish: FBTC (Solana) grades A and GHO (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FBTC and GHO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show FBTC at +9.45% and GHO at +0.16%.
More comparisons
FBTC vs USDUWETH vs FBTCFBTC vs METAZEREBRO vs FBTCUSD1 vs GHOTBTC vs GHOGHO vs UNIGHO vs FRXUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.