HostFARTBOY vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side
FARTBOY (Solana) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FARTBOY vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| FARTBOY | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01867 | $2.02 |
| Market cap | $17.17M | $933.19M |
| 24h volume | $173.44K | $599.42K |
| Liquidity | $336.56K | $331.88K |
| FDV | $17.17M | $933.19M |
| Holders | 12,515 | 125,921 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~54× the market cap of FARTBOY
- RENDER measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of FARTBOY
- RENDER measures ~10× the holder count of FARTBOY
- over the shared window FARTBOY moved +44.1% while RENDER moved +34.0%
What the data says
FARTBOY
FARTBOY — mint y1AZt42vceCmStjW4zetK3VoNarC1VxJ5iDjpiupump — is a pump.fun graduate running a community-takeover (CTO): the linked site is fartboycto.com and the handle is FARTBOY_CTO, meaning the original deployer walked and the community runs the token now. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $17.2 million across 12,515 holders.
The CTO structure deserves an honest read in both directions. A community takeover removes the classic deployer-rug — the person most positioned to dump is gone, and mint and freeze authorities are revoked regardless. What it doesn't remove is the risk shape that made the deployer leave: a $17 million valuation on $337 thousand of liquidity is a 2% floor, and $52 thousand of daily volume is thin for the cap it supports.
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FARTBOY or RENDER?
By tracked market cap: FARTBOY (Solana) measures $17.17M and RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FARTBOY or RENDER?
On the contract checks we publish: FARTBOY (Solana) grades A and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FARTBOY and RENDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FARTBOY at +44.1% and RENDER at +34.0%.
More comparisons
AIN vs FARTBOYPOP vs FARTBOYFARTBOY vs CBLTCFARTBOY vs LVMONRENDER vs LAVALVMON vs RENDERRENDER vs XBTRENDER vs MSUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.