HostEVA vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
EVA (Arbitrum) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EVA vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| EVA | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $45.42 | $2.64 |
| Market cap | — | $457.55M |
| 24h volume | $44.55K | $1.20M |
| Liquidity | $6.25M | $3.40M |
| FDV | $818.08M | $38.28M |
| Holders | 8,567 | 70,287 |
| Age (days) | 802 | 1,293 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- EVA measures ~1.8× the liquidity of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~27× the 24h volume of EVA
- PENDLE measures ~8.2× the holder count of EVA
What the data says
EVA
EVA — EverValueCoin at 0x45d9831d8751b2325f3dbf48db748723726e1c8c — is 802 days into an Arbitrum record with a contract that has stayed clean the whole way: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply.
The market structure splits two ways at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. $6.2 million of liquidity is a serious pool in absolute terms but thin against a $818.1 million cap — size an exit against the pool, not the cap — while the holder side is healthy: 8,567 wallets, with the top ten at about 29.5% — one of the broadest distributions among established tokens this batch.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $38.3 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $457.6 million market cap.
$3.4 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EVA or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: EVA (Arbitrum) measures — and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $457.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EVA or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: EVA (Arbitrum) grades A and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EVA and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show EVA at −0.20% and PENDLE at −4.03%.
More comparisons
EVA vs STONKEVA vs BNC4BONK vs EVAEVA vs EUSXPENDLE vs WBTCPENDLE vs GULDMSUSD vs PENDLEPOD vs PENDLE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.