HostERC20 vs RHEA — price, size and safety, side by side
ERC20 (BNB Chain) vs RHEA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ERC20 vs RHEA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| ERC20 | RHEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000000006729 | $0.08352 |
| Market cap | $592 | $15.12M |
| 24h volume | $963.75K | $2.12M |
| Liquidity | $259.65K | $224.73K |
| FDV | $13.44B | $3.57M |
| Holders | 8,688 | 6,624 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 420 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RHEA measures ~25,549× the market cap of ERC20
- RHEA measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of ERC20
- over the shared window ERC20 moved 0.00% while RHEA moved +123%
What the data says
ERC20
ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $13.4 billion on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $259.6 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.
RHEA
RHEA at 0x4c067de26475e1cefee8b8d1f6e2266b33a2372e is a 420-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $15.1 million asset-wide market cap against a $3.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 95.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is workable and the tape is busy: $224.7 thousand of tracked depth on $2.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself nine times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ERC20 or RHEA?
By tracked market cap: ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 and RHEA (BNB Chain) measures $15.12M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ERC20 or RHEA?
On the contract checks we publish: ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B and RHEA (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ERC20 and RHEA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show ERC20 at 0.00% and RHEA at +123%.
More comparisons
KITTY vs ERC20BEE vs ERC20CLAW vs ERC20MEBT vs ERC20CRV vs RHEASQD vs RHEARHEA vs MORIUNIBTC vs RHEA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.