Host一 vs R2 — price, size and safety, side by side
一 (BNB Chain) vs R2 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
一 vs R2 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| 一 | R2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004247 | $0.008519 |
| Market cap | $3.39M | $1.78M |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $4.11M |
| Liquidity | $172.97K | $124.34K |
| FDV | $4.26M | $17.07M |
| Holders | 74,515 | 5,955 |
| Age (days) | 249 | 4 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- 一 measures ~1.9× the market cap of R2
- R2 measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of 一
- 一 measures ~13× the holder count of R2
- over the shared window 一 moved −15.6% while R2 moved −50.1%
What the data says
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $173 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
R2
R² at 0x223a20e1b83aa3832e78d4b7b132df022e739222 is a four-day-old BNB Chain book — 4 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $1.8 million market cap against a $17.1 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units.
The launch tape is extreme even by BNB standards: $124.3 thousand of tracked depth on $4.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool turning over dozens of times a day, the profile of a routed launch book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 一 or R2?
By tracked market cap: 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M and R2 (BNB Chain) measures $1.78M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 一 or R2?
On the contract checks we publish: 一 (BNB Chain) grades A and R2 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 一 and R2 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show 一 at −15.6% and R2 at −50.1%.
More comparisons
一 vs CHIP一 vs PEPECAT一 vs ZRO一 vs LOCKINURA vs R2MASK vs R2R2 vs TREMPDUPE vs R2
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.