HostDUST vs WAMONUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
DUST (Monad) vs WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
DUST vs WAMONUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| DUST | WAMONUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02877 | $1.01 |
| Market cap | $85.31K | — |
| 24h volume | $77.13 | $12.41K |
| Liquidity | $59.03K | $32.87K |
| FDV | $2.92M | $2.74 |
| Holders | 1,604 | 8 |
| Age (days) | 84 | 47 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- DUST measures ~1.8× the liquidity of WAMONUSDT0
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~161× the 24h volume of DUST
- DUST measures ~201× the holder count of WAMONUSDT0
- over the shared window DUST moved −6.29% while WAMONUSDT0 moved 0.00%
What the data says
DUST
DUST at 0xad96c3dffcd6374294e2573a7fbba96097cc8d7c — Pixie Dust — is a Monad community token 84 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 1,604 holders sharing a 97.9 million supply around an $85.3 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution sits at the opposite extreme of clean code: the ten largest wallets hold 99.4% of supply. The $2.9 million fully-diluted figure sits far above the cap, and $59.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $77 of daily volume — a quiet book by any measure.
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DUST or WAMONUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: DUST (Monad) measures $85.31K and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DUST or WAMONUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: DUST (Monad) grades A and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DUST and WAMONUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show DUST at −6.29% and WAMONUSDT0 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BELIEVE vs DUSTJTVO vs DUSTDUST vs CNDLDUST vs HAPPYWAMONUSDT0 vs LADYBUGSCOUT vs WAMONUSDT0EDWIN vs WAMONUSDT0BEENZ vs WAMONUSDT0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.