HostDUST vs EMO — price, size and safety, side by side
DUST (Monad) vs EMO (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
DUST vs EMO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| DUST | EMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02877 | $0.0008896 |
| Market cap | $85.31K | $889.62K |
| 24h volume | $77.13 | $3.81K |
| Liquidity | $59.03K | $51.76K |
| FDV | $2.92M | $887.24K |
| Holders | 1,604 | 6,254 |
| Age (days) | 84 | 298 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EMO measures ~10× the market cap of DUST
- EMO measures ~49× the 24h volume of DUST
- EMO measures ~3.9× the holder count of DUST
- over the shared window DUST moved −6.29% while EMO moved +3.27%
What the data says
DUST
DUST at 0xad96c3dffcd6374294e2573a7fbba96097cc8d7c — Pixie Dust — is a Monad community token 84 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 1,604 holders sharing a 97.9 million supply around an $85.3 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution sits at the opposite extreme of clean code: the ten largest wallets hold 99.4% of supply. The $2.9 million fully-diluted figure sits far above the cap, and $59.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $77 of daily volume — a quiet book by any measure.
EMO
EMO at 0x81a224f8a62f52bde942dbf23a56df77a10b7777 — deployed under the name "emonad" — is a Monad community token 298 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at an $889.6 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep against the small cap: $51.8 thousand of tracked depth on $7.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a proportionate pool with a quiet tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DUST or EMO?
By tracked market cap: DUST (Monad) measures $85.31K and EMO (Monad) measures $889.62K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DUST or EMO?
On the contract checks we publish: DUST (Monad) grades A and EMO (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DUST and EMO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show DUST at −6.29% and EMO at +3.27%.
More comparisons
BELIEVE vs DUSTJTVO vs DUSTDUST vs CNDLDUST vs HAPPYDEGEN vs EMOIO vs EMOEMO vs TQQQXASS vs EMO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.