HostDIEM vs 牛来 — price, size and safety, side by side
DIEM (Base) vs 牛来 (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
DIEM vs 牛来 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| DIEM | 牛来 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.97K | $0.0001019 |
| Market cap | $83.97M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.20M | $27.03M |
| Liquidity | $12.25M | $9.74M |
| FDV | $83.94M | — |
| Holders | 10,548 | 5,089 |
| Age (days) | 397 | 1 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- 牛来 measures ~22× the 24h volume of DIEM
- DIEM measures ~2.1× the holder count of 牛来
What the data says
DIEM
Diem, ticker DIEM, is an asset on the Base chain. Its contract address is 0xf4d97f2da56e8c3098f3a8d538db630a2606a024. This snapshot reflects its state as of September 26, 2026.
Diem has a market cap of $84.0 million and a total supply of 37.4 thousand tokens. Its tracked pool liquidity is $12.3 million, with a 24h trading volume of $1.2 million. The token is 397 days old. NexFlow grades Diem at B for this snapshot. Pool depth for a token of this size is deep.
牛来
牛来 on Base — 0x688bd92e92a44ae7ad75016506b053fe5cfa8b07 — is one of three contracts this index tracks sharing the same Chinese name (roughly "the bull is coming"). This address carries the deepest of the three: $9.7 million of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The family resemblance is the story. Three tokens, one name, one chain, all priced within a fraction of a cent of each other at ~$0.0001, all cycling ~$26 million of daily volume — near-identical metrics across distinct contracts is the signature of a coordinated deployment or shared market-making arrangement, not three independent projects that happened to converge. The address above is the only identity; a buyer chasing "the" 牛来 by name alone has a one-in-three chance of landing on a different contract.
FAQ
Which is bigger, DIEM or 牛来?
By tracked market cap: DIEM (Base) measures $83.97M and 牛来 (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, DIEM or 牛来?
On the contract checks we publish: DIEM (Base) grades C and 牛来 (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have DIEM and 牛来 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show DIEM at 0.00% and 牛来 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDG vs DIEMDIEM vs RETHREUSD vs DIEMAZTEC vs DIEM牛来 vs 牛来牛来 vs OPENAI牛来 vs USDCWETH vs 牛来
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.