HostCRVUSD vs TBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
CRVUSD (Ethereum) vs TBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
CRVUSD vs TBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CRVUSD | TBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $83.41K |
| Market cap | $217.72M | $348.57M |
| 24h volume | $7.74M | $346.17K |
| Liquidity | $198.17M | $26.61M |
| FDV | $2.10B | $348.57M |
| Holders | 95,213 | 25,225 |
| Age (days) | 1,222 | 871 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- TBTC measures ~1.6× the market cap of CRVUSD
- CRVUSD measures ~7.4× the liquidity of TBTC
- CRVUSD measures ~22× the 24h volume of TBTC
- CRVUSD measures ~3.8× the holder count of TBTC
- over the shared window CRVUSD moved +0.05% while TBTC moved +7.88%
What the data says
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $198.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $26.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRVUSD or TBTC?
By tracked market cap: CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures $217.72M and TBTC (Ethereum) measures $348.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRVUSD or TBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B and TBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRVUSD and TBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CRVUSD at +0.05% and TBTC at +7.88%.
More comparisons
FWWETH vs CRVUSDWBTC vs CRVUSDCRVUSD vs SASHIMIUSDC vs CRVUSDTBTC vs USD1TBTC vs GHOTBTC vs UNITBTC vs FRXUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.