HostC vs Q — price, size and safety, side by side
C (BNB Chain) vs Q (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
C vs Q — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| C | Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0895 | $0.02155 |
| Market cap | $14.32M | $114.08M |
| 24h volume | $830.93K | $2.98M |
| Liquidity | $410.05K | $376.64K |
| FDV | $5.24M | $127.28M |
| Holders | 8,935 | 18,986 |
| Age (days) | 435 | 386 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- Q measures ~8.0× the market cap of C
- Q measures ~3.6× the 24h volume of C
- Q measures ~2.1× the holder count of C
- over the shared window C moved +17.2% while Q moved −15.4%
What the data says
C
C at 0xc32cc70741c3a8433dcbcb5ade071c299b55ffc8 — Chainbase Token — is a 435-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $14.3 million asset-wide market cap against a $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 58.6 million local units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $410.0 thousand of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than fourteen times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
Q
Q at 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589 — Quack AI Token — is a 386-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $114.1 million asset-wide market cap against a $127.3 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is hot: $376.6 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool eight times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, C or Q?
By tracked market cap: C (BNB Chain) measures $14.32M and Q (BNB Chain) measures $114.08M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, C or Q?
On the contract checks we publish: C (BNB Chain) grades A and Q (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have C and Q performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show C at +17.2% and Q at −15.4%.
More comparisons
C vs DJTVELVET vs CSUPER vs CCRV vs CAUSD vs QKLED vs QQ vs COQQ vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.