HostSUPER vs C — price, size and safety, side by side
SUPER (Avalanche) vs C (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SUPER vs C — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| SUPER | C | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.212 | $0.0895 |
| Market cap | $135.71M | $14.32M |
| 24h volume | $114.21K | $830.93K |
| Liquidity | $414.89K | $410.05K |
| FDV | $1.09M | $5.24M |
| Holders | 4,108 | 8,935 |
| Age (days) | 430 | 435 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SUPER measures ~9.5× the market cap of C
- C measures ~7.3× the 24h volume of SUPER
- C measures ~2.2× the holder count of SUPER
- over the shared window SUPER moved +44.7% while C moved +15.9%
What the data says
SUPER
SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $1.1 million fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $135.7 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $414.9 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.
C
C at 0xc32cc70741c3a8433dcbcb5ade071c299b55ffc8 — Chainbase Token — is a 435-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $14.3 million asset-wide market cap against a $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 58.6 million local units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $410.0 thousand of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than fourteen times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUPER or C?
By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $135.71M and C (BNB Chain) measures $14.32M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUPER or C?
On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and C (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUPER and C performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show SUPER at +44.7% and C at +15.9%.
More comparisons
CRV vs SUPERSUPER vs VELVETHIMS vs SUPERPRL vs SUPERC vs DJTVELVET vs CCRV vs CHIMS vs C
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.