HostBNC4 vs SLC — price, size and safety, side by side
BNC4 (BNB Chain) vs SLC (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
BNC4 vs SLC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| BNC4 | SLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.07 | $6.47 |
| Market cap | $7.95M | $54.28M |
| 24h volume | $1.53M | $1.72M |
| Liquidity | $6.03M | $5.06M |
| FDV | $7.95M | $71.89M |
| Holders | 71,736 | 20,069 |
| Age (days) | 13 | 71 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- SLC measures ~6.8× the market cap of BNC4
- BNC4 measures ~3.6× the holder count of SLC
- over the shared window BNC4 moved −5.73% while SLC moved −35.1%
What the data says
BNC4
BNC4 at 0x7c8d5502b544ddaf8852fc46d1174e34876d545c — deployed under the corporate-style name "Cea Industries" — is one of the youngest books in this index: 13 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and already priced at an $8.0 million market cap on a 1.2 million supply.
For a two-week-old book the pool is unusually strong: $6.0 million of tracked depth is deep — three-quarters of the cap — on $1.5 million of 24-hour volume, a tape that trades rather than sits. Everything else about the row is unwritten: no holder distribution in this snapshot, no contract-level controls assessed — a book this young carries its proof in the days ahead, not the record behind.
SLC
SLC at 0x8ac96df1d3dbd7c99a54cb4e50599ce129015e50 — styled StarLink — is a very young BNB Chain book: 71 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 20,069 holders sharing an 11.1 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the priced float is what the pools and the book say it is.
The grading pulls in opposite directions. For depth, $5.1 million of tracked liquidity is deep — the best absolute pool in this batch — on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume. Against it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted — and the ten largest wallets hold 99.7% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book behind a wide holder count. Freeze authority is revoked, and the contract is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BNC4 or SLC?
By tracked market cap: BNC4 (BNB Chain) measures $7.95M and SLC (BNB Chain) measures $54.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BNC4 or SLC?
On the contract checks we publish: BNC4 (BNB Chain) grades B and SLC (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BNC4 and SLC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show BNC4 at −5.73% and SLC at −35.1%.
More comparisons
BNC4 vs EUSXSTONK vs BNC4EVA vs BNC4BNC4 vs JUPPOPCAT vs SLCONYC vs SLCSLC vs PENGUSLC vs ARGUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.