Nex牛来 vs AKE — price, size and safety, side by side
牛来 (BNB Chain) vs AKE (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
牛来 vs AKE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| 牛来 | AKE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0591 | $0.002473 |
| Market cap | $63.81M | $116.18M |
| 24h volume | $11.87M all venues | $126.86M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.06M | $916.89K |
| FDV | $63.81M | $509.65M |
| Holders | 64,716 | 43,061 |
| Age (days) | 52 | 415 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- AKE measures ~1.8× the market cap of 牛来
- AKE measures ~11× the 24h volume of 牛来
- 牛来 measures ~1.5× the holder count of AKE
- over the shared window 牛来 moved −47.3% while AKE moved −94.5%
What the data says
牛来
牛来 at 0xbeea1d618e533a387d941f58a7d4c9b7bd377777 — a Chinese-language ticker, name and contract all reading as one — is a 37-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $63.8 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $1.1 million of tracked depth on $5.6 million of 24-hour volume — real flow for a month-old book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
AKE
AKE on BNB Smart Chain — 0x2c3a8ee94ddd97244a93bc48298f97d2c412f7db — is the elder of this index slice at roughly 13 months of tracked age, holding $917 thousand of liquidity in the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
Age changes the read on everything else. A contract that has survived thirteen months of BSC trading has passed the window where most outright scam contracts die — but longevity is not vindication, and the roughly $18 million of 24-hour volume against $917 thousand of liquidity is the same hot-turnover signature seen across this cohort. Sustained high turnover on a mature token reads as an actively market-made asset: tradeable, and priced by flow rather than by fundamentals this snapshot can see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 牛来 or AKE?
By tracked market cap: 牛来 (BNB Chain) measures $63.81M and AKE (BNB Chain) measures $116.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 牛来 or AKE?
On the contract checks we publish: 牛来 (BNB Chain) grades A and AKE (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 牛来 and AKE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show 牛来 at −47.3% and AKE at −94.5%.
More comparisons
QNT vs 牛来牛来 vs LIT牛来 vs USDT0牛来 vs USD₮0LIT vs AKEAKE vs USDT0AKE vs USD₮0AKE vs TBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.