NexAKE vs USD₮0 — price, size and safety, side by side
AKE (BNB Chain) vs USD₮0 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
AKE vs USD₮0 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| AKE | USD₮0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002473 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $116.18M | $3.32B |
| 24h volume | $126.86M all venues | $1.18M DEX |
| Liquidity | $916.89K | $753.74K |
| FDV | $509.65M | $18.74M |
| Holders | 43,061 | 75,853 |
| Age (days) | 415 | 418 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~29× the market cap of AKE
- AKE measures ~107× the 24h volume of USD₮0
- USD₮0 measures ~1.8× the holder count of AKE
- over the shared window AKE moved −91.2% while USD₮0 moved −0.36%
What the data says
AKE
AKE on BNB Smart Chain — 0x2c3a8ee94ddd97244a93bc48298f97d2c412f7db — is the elder of this index slice at roughly 13 months of tracked age, holding $917 thousand of liquidity in the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
Age changes the read on everything else. A contract that has survived thirteen months of BSC trading has passed the window where most outright scam contracts die — but longevity is not vindication, and the roughly $18 million of 24-hour volume against $917 thousand of liquidity is the same hot-turnover signature seen across this cohort. Sustained high turnover on a mature token reads as an actively market-made asset: tradeable, and priced by flow rather than by fundamentals this snapshot can see.
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AKE or USD₮0?
By tracked market cap: AKE (BNB Chain) measures $116.18M and USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $3.32B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AKE or USD₮0?
On the contract checks we publish: AKE (BNB Chain) grades A and USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AKE and USD₮0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show AKE at −91.2% and USD₮0 at −0.36%.
More comparisons
LIT vs AKEAKE vs USDT0AKE vs TBTCAKE vs USDC.EUSD₮0 vs TBTCUSD₮0 vs USDC.EUSDT0 vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs HLX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.