HostBEAR vs APEPE — price, size and safety, side by side
BEAR (Avalanche) vs APEPE (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
BEAR vs APEPE — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| BEAR | APEPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000003843 | $0.000001315 |
| Market cap | — | $259.18M |
| 24h volume | $0.00 | $43.11K |
| Liquidity | $4.69K | $4.56K |
| FDV | $16.17K | $259.18M |
| Holders | 5,263 | 416,143 |
| Age (days) | 1,018 | 1,201 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- APEPE measures ~79× the holder count of BEAR
- over the shared window BEAR moved −47.0% while APEPE moved 0.00%
What the data says
BEAR
BEAR is a 1,018-day-old Avalanche token at 0x19c79f282d151995d91f6dbdda2739701f9c47aa — nearly three years in — priced at a $16.2 thousand market cap across 5,263 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book has collapsed to a vestige: $4.7 thousand of tracked liquidity against a $16K cap, and the contract kept one live lever — it can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 51.1%, meaning even a five-figure cap is half-held by ten addresses. The grade is C at 60 — the snapshot's honest sum of thin venue, live mint, and concentrated float.
APEPE
The best news on APEPE is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. There is no mint function for anyone to inflate the supply with, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (85/100, 2026-09-26).
Market-wise, APEPE carries $4.56K of on-chain liquidity, 416,143 wallets holding and an established record at 1,201 days as of 2026-09-26. The number worth sitting with is that $4.56K of depth against a market cap of about $259.18M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: APEPE reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. With 416,143 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created APEPE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-26 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BEAR or APEPE?
By tracked market cap: BEAR (Avalanche) measures — and APEPE (Polygon) measures $259.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BEAR or APEPE?
On the contract checks we publish: BEAR (Avalanche) grades C and APEPE (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BEAR and APEPE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show BEAR at −47.0% and APEPE at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WFRAGSOL vs BEARJUGS vs BEARLLYX vs BEARMOBILE vs BEARAPEPE vs MONEYAPEPE vs GRAPEAPEPE vs PRICELESSWFRAGSOL vs APEPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.