HostWFRAGSOL vs BEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
WFRAGSOL (Solana) vs BEAR (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WFRAGSOL vs BEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WFRAGSOL | BEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $135.77 | $0.00000003843 |
| Market cap | $2.64M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.50K | $0.00 |
| Liquidity | $4.69K | $4.69K |
| FDV | $2.64M | $16.17K |
| Holders | 8,250 | 5,263 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,018 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WFRAGSOL measures ~1.6× the holder count of BEAR
- over the shared window WFRAGSOL moved +3.73% while BEAR moved −46.8%
What the data says
WFRAGSOL
WFRAGSOL — "Wrapped Fragmetric Restaked SOL" on Solana, mint WFRGSWjaz8tbAxsJitmbfRuFV2mSNwy7BMWcCwaA28U — is the real wrapped Fragmetric LRT: the wrapped form of Fragmetric's restaked-SOL receipt — a substantive restaking product. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $2.64 million across 8,250 holders at $107.5 per unit.
At $107.5 the unit tracks SOL's price zone — a restaked-SOL receipt is a SOL claim plus yield — across a 21.8k-unit supply on an eight-thousand file: real-LRT distribution. ~$573 of daily volume on $4.7 thousand is a modest book. Freeze revoked; mint unreported.
BEAR
BEAR is a 1,018-day-old Avalanche token at 0x19c79f282d151995d91f6dbdda2739701f9c47aa — nearly three years in — priced at a $16.2 thousand market cap across 5,263 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book has collapsed to a vestige: $4.7 thousand of tracked liquidity against a $16K cap, and the contract kept one live lever — it can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 51.1%, meaning even a five-figure cap is half-held by ten addresses. The grade is C at 60 — the snapshot's honest sum of thin venue, live mint, and concentrated float.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WFRAGSOL or BEAR?
By tracked market cap: WFRAGSOL (Solana) measures $2.64M and BEAR (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WFRAGSOL or BEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: WFRAGSOL (Solana) grades A and BEAR (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WFRAGSOL and BEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WFRAGSOL at +3.73% and BEAR at −46.8%.
More comparisons
JUGS vs WFRAGSOLLLYX vs WFRAGSOLMOBILE vs WFRAGSOLMONAI vs WFRAGSOLJUGS vs BEARLLYX vs BEARMOBILE vs BEARMONAI vs BEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.