Open app

牛马 vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side

牛马 (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26T06:07:05 / 2026-09-26.

牛马C

$0.002056
牛马 on BNB Chain
Trade 牛马
vs

果蝇B

$0.0007154
永生果蝇 on BNB Chain
Trade 果蝇

牛马 vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05

100 — shared start
牛马 0.00%  ·  果蝇 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
牛马果蝇
Price$0.002056$0.0007154
Market cap$2.02M$438.50K
24h volume$3.01M$986.53K
Liquidity$109.50K$83.02K
FDV$2.02M$715.42K
Holders8,9847,706
Age (days)36
Safety gradeCB

Where they differ

What the data says

牛马

牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $2.0 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.

The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $109.5 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.

Full 牛马 safety read →

果蝇

永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.

The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.

Full 果蝇 safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, 牛马 or 果蝇?

By tracked market cap: 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $2.02M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, 牛马 or 果蝇?

On the contract checks we publish: 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have 牛马 and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show 牛马 at 0.00% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.

More comparisons

ROUTER vs 牛马MOOBIFI vs 牛马牛马 vs FIGHTSPACEX vs 牛马RDDT vs 果蝇UWU vs 果蝇GTA 6 COIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LMT

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.