Open app

ANT vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side

ANT (Arbitrum) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.

ANTA

$0.03082
Autonomi on Arbitrum
Trade ANT
vs

RDNTC

$0.0004521
Radiant on Arbitrum
Trade RDNT

ANT vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
ANT −8.32%  ·  RDNT −5.68% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
ANTRDNT
Price$0.03082$0.0004521
Market cap$11.53M$688.76K
24h volume$9.74K$1.39K
Liquidity$86.33K$61.05K
FDV$40.34M$459.55K
Holders41,570101,322
Age (days)587—
Safety gradeAC

Where they differ

What the data says

ANT

ANT at 0xa78d8321b20c4ef90ecd72f2588aa985a4bdb684 — deployed under the name Autonomi — is an Arbitrum asset 587 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $11.5 million market cap prices under a third of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure — most of the claim sits outside the priced float.

The local book is thin and the tape quiet: $86.3 thousand of tracked depth on $9.7 thousand of 24-hour volume. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.

Full ANT safety read →

RDNT

RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.

Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.

Full RDNT safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ANT or RDNT?

By tracked market cap: ANT (Arbitrum) measures $11.53M and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ANT or RDNT?

On the contract checks we publish: ANT (Arbitrum) grades A and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ANT and RDNT performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ANT at −8.32% and RDNT at −5.68%.

More comparisons

ANT vs FLWSCBADA vs ANTFAFO vs ANTIONQ vs ANTETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKO

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.