HostAMWBTC vs RISE — price, size and safety, side by side
AMWBTC (Polygon) vs RISE (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
AMWBTC vs RISE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AMWBTC | RISE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.05K | $0.0006584 |
| Market cap | $5.14M | — |
| 24h volume | $13.74K | $31.48K |
| Liquidity | $943.43K | $849.23K |
| FDV | $5.03M | $2.48M |
| Holders | 9,807 | 93,329 |
| Age (days) | 1,518 | 165 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RISE measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- RISE measures ~9.5× the holder count of AMWBTC
- over the shared window AMWBTC moved +3.57% while RISE moved −91.0%
What the data says
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
RISE
RISE gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. Neither lever existing is the main reason RISE's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-27).
By the numbers, RISE is showing a $849.23K pool, 93,329 wallets holding and 165 days old as of 2026-09-27. Read $849.23K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. A 93,329-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of RISE as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMWBTC or RISE?
By tracked market cap: AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M and RISE (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMWBTC or RISE?
On the contract checks we publish: AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B and RISE (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMWBTC and RISE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AMWBTC at +3.57% and RISE at −91.0%.
More comparisons
FWOG vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTCGOOGLC vs RISELINK vs RISELDO vs RISERISE vs AEON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.