HostAIN vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side
AIN (BNB Chain) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
AIN vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| AIN | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02133 | $2.02 |
| Market cap | $3.95M | $933.19M |
| 24h volume | $67.27K | $599.42K |
| Liquidity | $336.63K | $331.88K |
| FDV | $21.27M | $933.19M |
| Holders | 18,094 | 125,921 |
| Age (days) | 439 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~236× the market cap of AIN
- RENDER measures ~8.9× the 24h volume of AIN
- RENDER measures ~7.0× the holder count of AIN
- over the shared window AIN moved −10.3% while RENDER moved +56.5%
What the data says
AIN
AIN — Infinity Ground AI on BNB Smart Chain, 0x9558a9254890b2a8b057a789f413631b9084f4a3 — is a fourteen-month-old AI-themed token holding $337 thousand of liquidity in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, against roughly $20.0 million of daily volume.
The pairing that matters: 439 days of age with turnover near 18x the pool. Age normally dampens churn — survivors settle into holder bases and quieter books — but AIN runs the opposite profile, the pool cycling its full depth many times daily. That reads as persistent market-maker or desk activity around an established token: the asset is old enough to have a trading history, and active enough that its price is being made, not found.
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AIN or RENDER?
By tracked market cap: AIN (BNB Chain) measures $3.95M and RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AIN or RENDER?
On the contract checks we publish: AIN (BNB Chain) grades B and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AIN and RENDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show AIN at −10.3% and RENDER at +56.5%.
More comparisons
AIN vs FARTBOYPOP vs AINAIN vs CBLTCAIN vs LVMONRENDER vs LAVALVMON vs RENDERRENDER vs XBTRENDER vs MSUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.