NexZRO vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
ZRO (Base) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
ZRO vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| ZRO | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.38 | $0.01423 |
| Market cap | $746.87M | $24.09M |
| 24h volume | $85.18M all venues | $909.50K all venues |
| Liquidity | $339.39K | $117.49K |
| FDV | $11.37M | $24.36M |
| Holders | 448,955 | 17,087 |
| Age (days) | 176 | 824 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~31× the market cap of SQD
- ZRO measures ~2.9× the liquidity of SQD
- ZRO measures ~94× the 24h volume of SQD
- ZRO measures ~26× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window ZRO moved +11.8% while SQD moved −48.8%
What the data says
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $746.9 million market cap towers over the $11.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $339.4 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $24.1 million market cap prices nearly all of the $24.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $117.5 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZRO or SQD?
By tracked market cap: ZRO (Base) measures $746.87M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $24.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZRO or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: ZRO (Base) grades A and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZRO and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show ZRO at +11.8% and SQD at −48.8%.
More comparisons
CRV vs ZROZRO vs GOHOMEZRO vs VIRTUALMON vs ZROSQD vs RAINLINK vs SQDSQD vs AVAXSQD vs LDO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.