HostZORA vs EVA — price, size and safety, side by side
ZORA (Base) vs EVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ZORA vs EVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| ZORA | EVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008535 | $45.42 |
| Market cap | $38.15M | — |
| 24h volume | $348.07K | $44.55K |
| Liquidity | $6.63M | $6.25M |
| FDV | $85.35M | $818.08M |
| Holders | 1,118,029 | 8,567 |
| Age (days) | 516 | 802 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZORA measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of EVA
- ZORA measures ~131× the holder count of EVA
What the data says
ZORA
ZORA at 0x1111111111166b7fe7bd91427724b487980afc69 is the Zora creator-network token on Base, 516 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $38.2 million market cap prices under half of the $85.3 million fully-diluted figure on 10.0 billion units.
The book is thin for the cap but the tape is the busiest in this slice of the corpus: $6.6 million of tracked depth on $416.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover several times the pool daily, a heavily routed book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
EVA
EVA — EverValueCoin at 0x45d9831d8751b2325f3dbf48db748723726e1c8c — is 802 days into an Arbitrum record with a contract that has stayed clean the whole way: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply.
The market structure splits two ways at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. $6.2 million of liquidity is a serious pool in absolute terms but thin against a $818.1 million cap — size an exit against the pool, not the cap — while the holder side is healthy: 8,567 wallets, with the top ten at about 29.5% — one of the broadest distributions among established tokens this batch.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZORA or EVA?
By tracked market cap: ZORA (Base) measures $38.15M and EVA (Arbitrum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZORA or EVA?
On the contract checks we publish: ZORA (Base) grades A and EVA (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZORA and EVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show ZORA at +1.13% and EVA at −0.20%.
More comparisons
ZORA vs BONKJLP vs ZORAZORA vs STONKFARTCOIN vs ZORAEVA vs STONKEVA vs BNC4BONK vs EVAEVA vs EUSX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.