HostZEN vs BRETT — price, size and safety, side by side
ZEN (Base) vs BRETT (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
ZEN vs BRETT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ZEN | BRETT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $7.88 | $0.006153 |
| Market cap | $146.28M | $60.97M |
| 24h volume | $4.76M | $418.84K |
| Liquidity | $1.44M | $1.25M |
| FDV | $167.58M | $60.97M |
| Holders | 104,424 | 907,798 |
| Age (days) | 425 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZEN measures ~2.4× the market cap of BRETT
- ZEN measures ~11× the 24h volume of BRETT
- BRETT measures ~8.7× the holder count of ZEN
- over the shared window ZEN moved −1.25% while BRETT moved +6.44%
What the data says
ZEN
ZEN is Horizen's token — a veteran privacy-chain project that migrated its ecosystem onto a Base-settled architecture after years as a standalone chain. The contract 0xf43eb8de897fbc7f2502483b2bef7bb9ea179229 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $1.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: ZEN is a legacy-network bet in a new wrapper — the zero-knowledge lineage and once-large validator base are real, and so is the migration risk: projects that replatform are simultaneously conceding the old home couldn't hold them and asking the new one to re-rate them. Watch whether Base-era usage actually follows the token.
BRETT
BRETT passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. Neither lever existing is the main reason BRETT's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-27).
Looking at the market data, BRETT shows $1.25M of on-chain liquidity and 907,798 holders as of 2026-09-27. The $1.25M pool against a ~$60.97M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. A holder base of 907,798 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-09-27, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZEN or BRETT?
By tracked market cap: ZEN (Base) measures $146.28M and BRETT (Base) measures $60.97M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZEN or BRETT?
On the contract checks we publish: ZEN (Base) grades B and BRETT (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZEN and BRETT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ZEN at −1.25% and BRETT at +6.44%.
More comparisons
ATH vs ZENZEN vs MKRZEN vs TSLAXZEN vs TELBRETT vs MORPHOCLANKER vs BRETTBRETT vs VIBEBRETT vs TWT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.