HostZAMA vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs WLD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ZAMA vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| ZAMA | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08418 | $0.5511 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $2.05B |
| 24h volume | $7.04M | $253.44K |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $140.93K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $5.51B |
| Holders | 3,540 | 63,635 |
| Age (days) | 234 | — |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~8.3× the market cap of ZAMA
- ZAMA measures ~2.2× the liquidity of WLD
- ZAMA measures ~28× the 24h volume of WLD
- WLD measures ~18× the holder count of ZAMA
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or WLD?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and WLD (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at 0.00% and WLD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GM vs ZAMANEARKAT vs ZAMAVERSE vs ZAMAZAMA vs ENSOWLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.