NexZAMA vs GSTOCK — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs GSTOCK (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
ZAMA vs GSTOCK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| ZAMA | GSTOCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06587 | $0.003831 |
| Market cap | $180.16M | $3.16M |
| 24h volume | $10.54M all venues | $1.39M all venues |
| Liquidity | $346.11K | $315.43K |
| FDV | $16.71M | $3.15M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 9,063 |
| Age (days) | 234 | 19 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~57× the market cap of GSTOCK
- ZAMA measures ~7.6× the 24h volume of GSTOCK
- GSTOCK measures ~2.6× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window ZAMA moved −34.3% while GSTOCK moved −87.7%
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $180.2 million asset-wide market cap against a $16.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $346.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GSTOCK
GSTOCK is a four-day-old BNB Chain deployment at 0xcafdbce93477261db8250e42bdae6e66733f9e20, priced at a $3.2 million market cap across 9,063 wallets on the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
For a four-day-old asset the structure is uncommonly clean: the contract cannot mint, cannot pause, cannot blacklist, and isn't a proxy — the locked set behind grade A — while the top ten wallets hold about 23.5%, a genuinely spread float for a launch. The tracked pool of $315 thousand is real depth for a debut week, though still thin against the cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or GSTOCK?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $180.16M and GSTOCK (BNB Chain) measures $3.16M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or GSTOCK?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and GSTOCK (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and GSTOCK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at −34.3% and GSTOCK at −87.7%.
More comparisons
ZAMA vs CRVZAMA vs GOHOMEZAMA vs VIRTUALMON vs ZAMAGOHOME vs GSTOCKGSTOCK vs VIRTUALCRV vs GSTOCKGSTOCK vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.