NexWOO vs SQD — price, size and safety, side by side
WOO (Ethereum) vs SQD (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
WOO vs SQD — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| WOO | SQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01024 | $0.01423 |
| Market cap | $22.60M | $24.09M |
| 24h volume | $4.27M all venues | $909.50K all venues |
| Liquidity | $552.78K | $117.49K |
| FDV | $22.60M | $24.36M |
| Holders | 19,358 | 17,087 |
| Age (days) | 374 | 824 |
| Safety grade | A | D |
Where they differ
- WOO measures ~4.7× the liquidity of SQD
- WOO measures ~4.7× the 24h volume of SQD
- over the shared window WOO moved −15.4% while SQD moved −44.7%
What the data says
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $553 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $24.1 million market cap prices nearly all of the $24.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $117.5 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WOO or SQD?
By tracked market cap: WOO (Ethereum) measures $22.60M and SQD (Arbitrum) measures $24.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WOO or SQD?
On the contract checks we publish: WOO (Ethereum) grades A and SQD (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WOO and SQD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show WOO at −15.4% and SQD at −44.7%.
More comparisons
FET vs WOOWBTC vs WOOHLX vs WOOWOO vs STABLESQD vs RAINLINK vs SQDSQD vs AVAXSQD vs LDO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.