HostWOLF vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
WOLF (Solana) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WOLF vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WOLF | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01173 | $0.08339 |
| Market cap | $11.43M | $580.57M |
| 24h volume | $1.19K | $1.98M |
| Liquidity | $512.90K | $507.53K |
| FDV | $11.43M | $737.23M |
| Holders | 2,739 | 307,239 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PYTH measures ~51× the market cap of WOLF
- PYTH measures ~1,663× the 24h volume of WOLF
- PYTH measures ~112× the holder count of WOLF
- over the shared window WOLF moved +36583% while PYTH moved +55.5%
What the data says
WOLF
Wolf — this deployment wins the 'wolf' slug over the LandWolf sibling — a Matt-Furie-universe meme (the wolf from the Boys' Club cast that BRETT, PEPE, and friends come from) on Solana at mint BTr5SwWSKPBrdUzboi2SVr1QvSjmh1caCYUkxsxLpump. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $513 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,739 holders — wait, and the sibling LandWolf runs ~$70k with 34k holders; the two fight over the same narrative.
Boys' Club tokens are an honest meme niche: a shared character universe where value is distributed by which deployment the market anoints. This WOLF has the deeper pool; LandWolf has the wider base — the market hasn't fully picked between them, and they can trade places.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WOLF or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: WOLF (Solana) measures $11.43M and PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WOLF or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: WOLF (Solana) grades A and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WOLF and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WOLF at +36583% and PYTH at +55.5%.
More comparisons
PEPE vs WOLFWOLF vs FELYWOLF vs STABLE4STOCK vs WOLFSTABLE vs PYTHFELY vs PYTHPYTH vs FLOCKPEPE vs PYTH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.