NexWNUSDT0 vs LVMON — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs LVMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
WNUSDT0 vs LVMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| WNUSDT0 | LVMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.03 | $0.01545 |
| Market cap | $356.94K | $1.07M |
| 24h volume | $235.62K all venues | $8.74K all venues |
| Liquidity | $356.23K | $238.45K |
| FDV | $356.39K | $1.07M |
| Holders | 40 | 7,741 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 296 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- LVMON measures ~3.0× the market cap of WNUSDT0
- WNUSDT0 measures ~27× the 24h volume of LVMON
- LVMON measures ~194× the holder count of WNUSDT0
- over the shared window WNUSDT0 moved +0.43% while LVMON moved −39.1%
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $356 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
LVMON
LVMON at 0x91b81bfbe3a747230f0529aa28d8b2bc898e6d56 — styled LeverUp MON — is a Monad asset 278 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.1 million market cap effectively equal to its $1.1 million fully-diluted figure on 73.2 million units.
The contract posture is the unusual split: mint authority is revoked and the contract cannot create new supply — but freeze authority is still active, meaning balances can be frozen, a reversal of the common pattern. It is not a proxy. The distribution is heavy: the ten largest wallets hold 93.4% of supply, with 7,741 holders sharing the rest. $238.4 thousand of deep tracked depth serves the small cap on $56.9 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or LVMON?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures $356.94K and LVMON (Monad) measures $1.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or LVMON?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and LVMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and LVMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.43% and LVMON at −39.1%.
More comparisons
WNUSDT0 vs CRVWNUSDT0 vs GOHOMEWNUSDT0 vs VIRTUALMON vs WNUSDT0LVMON vs ICPLVMON vs SOLVBTCLVMON vs UVMLVMON vs AAVE.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.