HostWLD vs LUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Optimism) vs LUSD (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WLD vs LUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WLD | LUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5355 | $1.02 |
| Market cap | $1.99B | $26.02M |
| 24h volume | $61.51K | $688.59 |
| Liquidity | $122.71K | $95.76K |
| FDV | $226.15M | $109.89K |
| Holders | 1,284,272 | 6,714 |
| Age (days) | 811 | 1,566 |
| Safety grade | D | D |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~76× the market cap of LUSD
- WLD measures ~89× the 24h volume of LUSD
- WLD measures ~191× the holder count of LUSD
- over the shared window WLD moved +20.1% while LUSD moved +2.02%
What the data says
WLD
WLD on Optimism at 0xdc6ff44d5d932cbd77b52e5612ba0529dc6226f1 is the bridged form of Worldcoin's token — the asset behind the orb-verified World ID network — and the September 27, 2026 snapshot hands it a D grade for reasons worth reading rather than guessing.
The flags are measured, not rumored. Minting is still possible on this contract — new supply can be minted — and the owner retains the ability to change balances. Freeze authority is revoked; that is the one lever the code lacks. Powers like these are the standard anatomy of a bridge-issued layer-two token — the bridge has to be able to issue the claim — but they sit on the contract either way. 1,284,272 wallets hold it on Optimism with the ten largest wallets at 72.7% of supply, and the thin end is the exit: $122.7 thousand of tracked pool depth against a $2.0 billion asset-wide cap, with $41.6 thousand changing hands in a day.
LUSD
LUSD at 0xc40f949f8a4e094d1b49a23ea9241d289b7b2819 is the Optimism-bridged deployment of Liquity's USD — the dollar whose Ethereum original is famously immutable, which makes the local contract posture here the detail that matters. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices the 110.4 thousand local units at $109.9 thousand fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $26.0 million market cap.
Unlike the governance-free Ethereum contract, this bridged deployment — 1,566 days into its record — still holds an active mint authority and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The book is nearly dormant: $95.8 thousand of thin tracked depth on $689 of 24-hour volume, with 6,714 holders whose ten largest wallets hold 82.0% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or LUSD?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Optimism) measures $1.99B and LUSD (Optimism) measures $26.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or LUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Optimism) grades D and LUSD (Optimism) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and LUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WLD at +20.1% and LUSD at +2.02%.
More comparisons
WLD vs OPUSAURY vs WLDPOL vs WLDWLD vs PERPSPADWEN vs LUSDCNKT+ vs LUSDLUSD vs MIMSOLC vs LUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.