HostWLD vs FRAX — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs FRAX (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-15.
WLD vs FRAX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| WLD | FRAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3043 | $0.9848 |
| Market cap | $1.34B | $215.89M |
| 24h volume | $259.88M all venues | $359.44K all venues |
| Liquidity | $183.45K | $114.10K |
| FDV | $3.58B | $611.82K |
| Holders | 64,146 | 10,083 |
| Age (days) | 1,162 | 1,414 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~6.2× the market cap of FRAX
- WLD measures ~1.6× the liquidity of FRAX
- WLD measures ~723× the 24h volume of FRAX
- WLD measures ~6.4× the holder count of FRAX
- over the shared window WLD moved −44.8% while FRAX moved −2.39%
What the data says
WLD
WLD — 0x163f8c2467924be0ae7b5347228cabf260318753 — is Worldcoin, the identity network's token distributed to people who let an orb scan their iris. Three years in, it remains one of the widest — and most divisive — distributions in crypto.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $1.3 billion market cap against a fully diluted valuation of $3.6 billion — only about a third of the eventual supply circulates, the rest still locked in the emissions schedule. Tracked on-chain depth is thin for the size at $183.5 thousand; WLD's real liquidity lives on centralized venues. Holders number 64,146, and the day prints -11.1%.
FRAX
FRAX at 0xd24c2ad096400b6fbcd2ad8b24e7acbc21a1da64 is the Avalanche deployment of Frax's dollar token, 1,399 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $215.9 million market cap dwarfs a $611.8 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 621.1 thousand local units.
The local book is thin and the tape quiet: $114.1 thousand of tracked depth on $9.6 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or FRAX?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $1.34B and FRAX (Avalanche) measures $215.89M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or FRAX?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and FRAX (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and FRAX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show WLD at −44.8% and FRAX at −2.39%.
More comparisons
WLD vs GRASSRENDER vs WLDWLD vs ETHFIWLD vs ZRORAIN vs FRAXFRAX vs AVAXLINK vs FRAXFRAX vs LDO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.