HostWLD vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Optimism) vs CRV (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WLD | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5355 | $0.3519 |
| Market cap | $1.99B | $552.13M |
| 24h volume | $61.51K | $130.97K |
| Liquidity | $122.71K | $414.92K |
| FDV | $226.15M | $6.89M |
| Holders | 1,284,272 | 29,093 |
| Age (days) | 811 | 1,687 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~3.6× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~3.4× the liquidity of WLD
- CRV measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of WLD
- WLD measures ~44× the holder count of CRV
- over the shared window WLD moved +19.0% while CRV moved −2.31%
What the data says
WLD
WLD on Optimism at 0xdc6ff44d5d932cbd77b52e5612ba0529dc6226f1 is the bridged form of Worldcoin's token — the asset behind the orb-verified World ID network — and the September 27, 2026 snapshot hands it a D grade for reasons worth reading rather than guessing.
The flags are measured, not rumored. Minting is still possible on this contract — new supply can be minted — and the owner retains the ability to change balances. Freeze authority is revoked; that is the one lever the code lacks. Powers like these are the standard anatomy of a bridge-issued layer-two token — the bridge has to be able to issue the claim — but they sit on the contract either way. 1,284,272 wallets hold it on Optimism with the ten largest wallets at 72.7% of supply, and the thin end is the exit: $122.7 thousand of tracked pool depth against a $2.0 billion asset-wide cap, with $41.6 thousand changing hands in a day.
CRV
CRV at 0x11cdb42b0eb46d95f990bedd4695a6e3fa034978 — Curve DAO Token — is the bridged Arbitrum deployment of the Curve protocol's governance asset, 1,687 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $552.1 million market cap towers over the $6.9 million fully-diluted figure on 19.6 million local units.
The local book is thin against the headline: $414.9 thousand of tracked depth on $291.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice that moves with flow rather than holding a primary pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or CRV?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Optimism) measures $1.99B and CRV (Arbitrum) measures $552.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Optimism) grades D and CRV (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WLD at +19.0% and CRV at −2.31%.
More comparisons
WLD vs OPUSAURY vs WLDPOL vs WLDWLD vs PERPSPADCRV vs SUPERCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs CRVPRL vs CRV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.