HostWLD vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-12.
WLD vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| WLD | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3043 | $0.2376 |
| Market cap | $1.34B | $416.06M |
| 24h volume | $259.88M all venues | $47.95M all venues |
| Liquidity | $183.45K | $8.70M |
| FDV | $3.58B | $638.63M |
| Holders | 64,146 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 1,162 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~3.2× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~47× the liquidity of WLD
- WLD measures ~5.4× the 24h volume of CRV
- CRV measures ~1.6× the holder count of WLD
- over the shared window WLD moved −44.8% while CRV moved −30.9%
What the data says
WLD
WLD — 0x163f8c2467924be0ae7b5347228cabf260318753 — is Worldcoin, the identity network's token distributed to people who let an orb scan their iris. Three years in, it remains one of the widest — and most divisive — distributions in crypto.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $1.3 billion market cap against a fully diluted valuation of $3.6 billion — only about a third of the eventual supply circulates, the rest still locked in the emissions schedule. Tracked on-chain depth is thin for the size at $183.5 thousand; WLD's real liquidity lives on centralized venues. Holders number 64,146, and the day prints -11.1%.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or CRV?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $1.34B and CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show WLD at −44.8% and CRV at −30.9%.
More comparisons
WLD vs GRASSRENDER vs WLDWLD vs ETHFIWLD vs ZROCRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.