NexWEETH vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side
WEETH (Ethereum) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
WEETH vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| WEETH | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.17K | $0.0004275 |
| Market cap | $4.86B | $647.15K |
| 24h volume | $7.59M all venues | $19.13K all venues |
| Liquidity | $10.49M | $56.03K |
| FDV | $4.86B | $463.35K |
| Holders | — | 101,328 |
| Age (days) | 882 | 1,216 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~7,511× the market cap of RDNT
- WEETH measures ~187× the liquidity of RDNT
- WEETH measures ~397× the 24h volume of RDNT
- over the shared window WEETH moved −27.7% while RDNT moved −8.68%
What the data says
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $10.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices a $647.2 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $56.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WEETH or RDNT?
By tracked market cap: WEETH (Ethereum) measures $4.86B and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $647.15K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WEETH or RDNT?
On the contract checks we publish: WEETH (Ethereum) grades B and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WEETH and RDNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show WEETH at −27.7% and RDNT at −8.68%.
More comparisons
WEETH vs USDTBWEETH vs SUSDAIWEETH vs SKYUSDG vs WEETHRDNT vs TSATRDNT vs POLUNI vs RDNTLINK.E vs RDNT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.