HostWEETH vs AQUARIUS — price, size and safety, side by side
WEETH (Ethereum) vs AQUARIUS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
WEETH vs AQUARIUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WEETH | AQUARIUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.97K | $0.000108 |
| Market cap | $5.89B | $99.31K |
| 24h volume | $532.17K | $515.54 |
| Liquidity | $14.39M | $9.50K |
| FDV | $5.89B | $99.31K |
| Holders | 28,590 | 2,826 |
| Age (days) | 990 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- WEETH measures ~59,306× the market cap of AQUARIUS
- WEETH measures ~1,515× the liquidity of AQUARIUS
- WEETH measures ~1,032× the 24h volume of AQUARIUS
- WEETH measures ~10× the holder count of AQUARIUS
- over the shared window WEETH moved +7.42% while AQUARIUS moved +17.2%
What the data says
WEETH
weETH is ether.fi's wrapped eETH — the non-rebasing form of the liquid restaking token that sits on EigenLayer beneath the staking layer, so the holder earns both Ethereum staking yield and restaking yield in one claim. The deployment 0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $14.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: a restaking token is a claim on ETH that is doing two jobs at once — securing Ethereum's consensus and securing EigenLayer services — which means its risk stack is the union of both: staking slashing, restaking slashing, and ether.fi's own contract layer on top. The yield is real; so is the doubled surface it comes from.
AQUARIUS
AQUARIUS — "Aquarius" on Solana, mint C49Ut3om3QFTDrMZ5Cr8VcTKPpHDcQ2Fv8mmuJHHigDt — is the Aquarius entry in the same zodiac-sign series, holding 2,826 wallets against a $99 thousand cap.
The snapshot shows a $7.1 thousand pool on ~$39 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WEETH or AQUARIUS?
By tracked market cap: WEETH (Ethereum) measures $5.89B and AQUARIUS (Solana) measures $99.31K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WEETH or AQUARIUS?
On the contract checks we publish: WEETH (Ethereum) grades B and AQUARIUS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WEETH and AQUARIUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WEETH at +7.42% and AQUARIUS at +17.2%.
More comparisons
WEETH vs UWEETH vs USDCWEETH vs AGXUSDE vs WEETHAQUARIUS vs CUMOIL vs AQUARIUSSAMO vs AQUARIUSAQUARIUS vs 143
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.