HostWBTC vs RNT — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs RNT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WBTC vs RNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WBTC | RNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.65K | $0.3135 |
| Market cap | $9.83B | $43.74M |
| 24h volume | $30.16M | $15.04K |
| Liquidity | $224.32M | $2.20M |
| FDV | $9.83B | $62.44M |
| Holders | 196,306 | 4,666 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 1,064 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~225× the market cap of RNT
- WBTC measures ~102× the liquidity of RNT
- WBTC measures ~2,006× the 24h volume of RNT
- WBTC measures ~42× the holder count of RNT
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $224.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
RNT
RNT at 0x27ab6e82f3458edbc0703db2756391b899ce6324 — the Reental Utility Token — is a long-running Polygon asset: 1,064 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.7 million market cap with a $62.4 million fully-diluted figure on 199.8 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is one of the healthier shapes in this index: $2.2 million of tracked depth is deep relative to the cap, though the $15.0 thousand daily volume is quiet — an asset held more than it is flipped. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority question belongs to the live scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or RNT?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.83B and RNT (Polygon) measures $43.74M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or RNT?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and RNT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and RNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +0.17% and RNT at +0.31%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs FWWETHUSDC vs WBTCWBTC vs CRVUSDWETH vs WBTCRNT vs VIRTUALPIPPIN vs RNTANSEM vs RNTRNT vs CARDS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.