HostWBTC vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WBTC vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WBTC | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.65K | $8.02 |
| Market cap | $9.83B | $303.44M |
| 24h volume | $30.16M | $27.72K |
| Liquidity | $224.32M | $2.75M |
| FDV | $9.83B | $336.65M |
| Holders | 196,306 | 31,222 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 106 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~32× the market cap of FUN
- WBTC measures ~81× the liquidity of FUN
- WBTC measures ~1,088× the 24h volume of FUN
- WBTC measures ~6.3× the holder count of FUN
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $224.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or FUN?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.83B and FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +0.17% and FUN at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs FWWETHUSDC vs WBTCWBTC vs CRVUSDWETH vs WBTCMSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNFUN vs USDT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.