HostWBTC vs AIPF — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs AIPF (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
WBTC vs AIPF — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| WBTC | AIPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $68.04K | $0.3115 |
| Market cap | $8.82B | $27.67M |
| 24h volume | $456.69M all venues | $268.10K all venues |
| Liquidity | $188.50M | $3.13M |
| FDV | $8.82B | $27.67M |
| Holders | 197,266 | — |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 324 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~319× the market cap of AIPF
- WBTC measures ~60× the liquidity of AIPF
- WBTC measures ~1,703× the 24h volume of AIPF
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $188.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
AIPF
AIPF at 0x2c72d25530191ebd244eb6325e1892480b0e6e28 — styled AI Powered Finance — is a Polygon-native asset 306 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $27.7 million market cap across 75.9 million units.
The book is the strongest structural read in this batch: $3.1 million of tracked pool depth is deep relative to the cap — a pool that can absorb real exits — on $361.8 thousand of 24-hour volume, a tape that actually trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a question for the live scan rather than an assumption this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or AIPF?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $8.82B and AIPF (Polygon) measures $27.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or AIPF?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and AIPF (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and AIPF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −19.0% and AIPF at −23.7%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs CBBTCWBTC vs USDSWBTC vs STETHWBTC vs PYUSDASTER vs AIPFXRP vs AIPFDRV vs AIPFPRIME vs AIPF
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.