HostWBTC.E vs BLACK — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC.E (Avalanche) vs BLACK (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
WBTC.E vs BLACK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| WBTC.E | BLACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.66K | $0.002101 |
| Market cap | $22.96M | $843.61K |
| 24h volume | $15.19K all venues | $10.67K all venues |
| Liquidity | $295.75K | $232.64K |
| FDV | $22.96M | $855.00K |
| Holders | 8,992 | 19,436 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 445 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~27× the market cap of BLACK
- BLACK measures ~2.2× the holder count of WBTC.E
What the data says
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $23.0 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $295.7 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
BLACK
BLACK at 0xcd94a87696fac69edae3a70fe5725307ae1c43f6 — the BLACKHOLE token — is an Avalanche asset 430 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $843.6 thousand market cap sitting effectively equal to its $855.0 thousand fully-diluted figure on 284.6 million units: the float is out.
19,436 holders share the book, with the ten largest wallets holding 45.8% of supply — a moderate top bracket for the chain. The counterweights sit in the contract: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. $232.6 thousand of tracked depth reads deep against the small cap, though the $7.9 thousand daily volume is quiet.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC.E or BLACK?
By tracked market cap: WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $22.96M and BLACK (Avalanche) measures $843.61K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC.E or BLACK?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B and BLACK (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC.E and BLACK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show WBTC.E at −23.0% and BLACK at −22.3%.
More comparisons
VIRTUAL vs WBTC.EGOHOME vs WBTC.ECRV vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs ICPBLACK vs ICPBLACK vs SOLVBTCBLACK vs UVMBLACK vs AAVE.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.