HostVVV vs JUPUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
VVV (Base) vs JUPUSD (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
VVV vs JUPUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| VVV | JUPUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30.79 | $0.9996 |
| Market cap | $1.48B | $43.99M |
| 24h volume | $6.32M | $17.97M |
| Liquidity | $21.25M | $19.72M |
| FDV | $2.50B | $43.99M |
| Holders | 154,159 | 12,380 |
| Age (days) | 158 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- VVV measures ~34× the market cap of JUPUSD
- JUPUSD measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of VVV
- VVV measures ~12× the holder count of JUPUSD
- over the shared window VVV moved +36.6% while JUPUSD moved −0.01%
What the data says
VVV
VVV is Venice.ai's token — Erik Voorhees' uncensored-AI platform, where staking VVV buys a share of the platform's inference capacity rather than a pure governance claim. The contract 0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $21.2 million of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest read: VVV is unusual among AI tokens for having a concrete utility loop — stake, get API quota — so its demand partly tracks actual inference usage rather than pure narrative. The counterweights are the usual: a single-platform dependency, and the fact that "uncensored" positioning is both the moat and the regulatory question. A utility token on a real product is still a utility token.
JUPUSD
JupUSD is Jupiter's own dollar — the stablecoin the Solana DEX aggregator issued (with Ethena's infrastructure behind it) to give its venue a native settlement asset rather than renting someone else's. The mint JuprjznTrTSp2UFa3ZBUFgwdAmtZCq4MQCwysN55USD is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $19.7 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest framing: a venue-issued stablecoin's distribution is the venue — JupUSD's depth is guaranteed wherever Jupiter routes, and its incentive is adoption across the same pools this index measures. The risk shape is two-part: the Ethena-style reserve mechanics underneath plus Jupiter's operational role on top; neither is a fiat attestation, and an A grade here is a contract-state verdict, not a balance-sheet one.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VVV or JUPUSD?
By tracked market cap: VVV (Base) measures $1.48B and JUPUSD (Solana) measures $43.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VVV or JUPUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: VVV (Base) grades B and JUPUSD (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VVV and JUPUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show VVV at +36.6% and JUPUSD at −0.01%.
More comparisons
USDT vs VVVVVV vs OLD SLERFVVV vs PAXGVVV vs USDMJUPUSD vs RAYUSDM vs JUPUSDJUPUSD vs KBTCPAXG vs JUPUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.