Open app

VIRTUAL vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side

VIRTUAL (Solana) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.

VIRTUALA

$0.7984
Virtual Protocol on Solana
Trade VIRTUAL
vs

FUNA

$8.02
FunPay on Polygon
Trade FUN

VIRTUAL vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21

100 — shared start
VIRTUAL +10.3%  ·  FUN 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
VIRTUALFUN
Price$0.7984$8.02
Market cap$22.88M$303.44M
24h volume$399.67K$27.72K
Liquidity$2.19M$2.75M
FDV$22.88M$336.65M
Holders28,37631,222
Age (days)—106
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

VIRTUAL

VIRTUAL is Virtuals Protocol's token — the asset behind one of crypto-AI's more durable experiments: a platform where AI agents launch as tradable tokens and their activity routes value back to the protocol's token. The mint 3iQL8BFS2vE7mww4ehAqQHAsbmRNCrPxizWAT2Zfyr9y is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $2.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.

The honest shape: Virtuals is a platform bet in the crypto-AI cohort — its token's value depends on agents it hosts actually generating sustained activity rather than launch-day volume spikes, which is the failure mode most agent-token platforms hit. The A grade covers the Solana mint; the platform's usage is an off-chain measurement.

Full VIRTUAL safety read →

FUN

FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.

The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.

Full FUN safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, VIRTUAL or FUN?

By tracked market cap: VIRTUAL (Solana) measures $22.88M and FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, VIRTUAL or FUN?

On the contract checks we publish: VIRTUAL (Solana) grades A and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have VIRTUAL and FUN performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show VIRTUAL at +10.3% and FUN at 0.00%.

More comparisons

VIRTUAL vs CARDSRNT vs VIRTUALPIPPIN vs VIRTUALANSEM vs VIRTUALMSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNUB vs FUN

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.