HostVELVET vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
VELVET (Base) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
VELVET vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| VELVET | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06182 | $8.02 |
| Market cap | $28.67M | $303.44M |
| 24h volume | $321.78K | $27.72K |
| Liquidity | $414.44K | $2.75M |
| FDV | $871.66K | $336.65M |
| Holders | 11,182 | 31,222 |
| Age (days) | 394 | 106 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- FUN measures ~11× the market cap of VELVET
- FUN measures ~6.6× the liquidity of VELVET
- VELVET measures ~12× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~2.8× the holder count of VELVET
What the data says
VELVET
Velvet (VELVET) is a DeFi-infrastructure token — a portfolio and intent-management stack that sits between asset-management UX and on-chain execution — deployed on Base at 0xbf927b841994731c573bdf09ceb0c6b0aa887cdd. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $414 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note: infrastructure tokens earn their valuation on integrations and flow, not narrative — the check is whether the stack actually routes volume under real users, which liquidity alone cannot tell you.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VELVET or FUN?
By tracked market cap: VELVET (Base) measures $28.67M and FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VELVET or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: VELVET (Base) grades B and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VELVET and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show VELVET at −0.54% and FUN at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUPER vs VELVETCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs VELVETPRL vs VELVETMSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNUB vs FUN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.