HostUSDT vs WPOL — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs WPOL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
USDT vs WPOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| USDT | WPOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.08061 |
| Market cap | $9.17B | $14.69M |
| 24h volume | $787.61M all venues | $8.36M all venues |
| Liquidity | $478.31M | $6.23M |
| FDV | $9.17B | $14.59M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 843,296 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 1,687 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~625× the market cap of WPOL
- USDT measures ~77× the liquidity of WPOL
- USDT measures ~94× the 24h volume of WPOL
- USDT measures ~96× the holder count of WPOL
- over the shared window USDT moved +0.01% while WPOL moved −20.5%
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $478.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
WPOL
WPOL at 0x0d500b1d8e8ef31e21c99d1db9a6444d3adf1270 is the gas token's wrapped twin — the ERC-20 face of POL on its own chain, the contract long-timers knew as WMATIC before the token migration renamed what it wraps. One POL in, one WPOL out; the wrapper exists because DeFi needs an ERC-20 and the gas token is not one.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot is as clean as this index prints: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A, on a wrapper whose entire job is to be boring. 843,296 wallets hold it; the market cap reads $14.7 million across 206.7 million wrapped units, and $6.2 million of tracked depth is deep for that size. Daily turnover of $16.1 million is the sound of plumbing doing work — a gas wrapper trades constantly because everything routes through it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or WPOL?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.17B and WPOL (Polygon) measures $14.69M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or WPOL?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and WPOL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and WPOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.01% and WPOL at −20.5%.
More comparisons
WBNB vs USDTWETH vs USDTUSDT vs CBBTCUSDT vs USDSWPOL vs EUROCWPOL vs ENAWPOL vs AEROUSDC vs WPOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.