HostUSDT vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDT vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| USDT | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9986 | $0.9731 |
| Market cap | $9.17B | — |
| 24h volume | $1.27B | $4.15 |
| Liquidity | $601.61M | $5.46M |
| FDV | $9.17B | $504.34M |
| Holders | 0 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 528 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~110× the liquidity of USD0++
- USDT measures ~306,398,702× the 24h volume of USD0++
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $601.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $5.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.17B and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades C and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.09% and USD0++ at −0.76%.
More comparisons
USDT vs USDCWBNB vs USDTUSDT vs USDCWETH vs USDTUSD0++ vs SDAIUSD0++ vs STLINKMOG vs USD0++USD0++ vs ZEC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.