HostUSDT vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-13.
USDT vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| USDT | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.9736 |
| Market cap | $9.17B | $498.06M |
| 24h volume | $787.61M all venues | $8.48M all venues |
| Liquidity | $478.31M | $5.28M |
| FDV | $9.17B | $497.44M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 528 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~18× the market cap of USD0++
- USDT measures ~91× the liquidity of USD0++
- USDT measures ~93× the 24h volume of USD0++
- USDT measures ~29,718× the holder count of USD0++
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $478.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.17B and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures $498.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.20% and USD0++ at −0.76%.
More comparisons
WBNB vs USDTWETH vs USDTUSDT vs CBBTCUSDT vs USDSSPX vs USD0++USD0++ vs JLPAERO vs USD0++USD0++ vs LBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.