HostUSDT vs OP — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs OP (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
USDT vs OP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| USDT | OP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.08213 |
| Market cap | $9.17B | $245.65M |
| 24h volume | $787.61M all venues | $45.22M all venues |
| Liquidity | $478.31M | $999.71K |
| FDV | $9.17B | $460.57M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 1,370,095 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 1,616 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~37× the market cap of OP
- USDT measures ~478× the liquidity of OP
- USDT measures ~17× the 24h volume of OP
- USDT measures ~59× the holder count of OP
- over the shared window USDT moved +0.01% while OP moved −23.0%
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $478.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
OP
OP at 0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000042 is the Optimism Collective's governance token — the canonical OP Mainnet deployment sitting in the chain's own vanity address space, not a bridged copy. The November 6, 2026 snapshot counts 1,370,095 holders around a $245.7 million market cap, $460.6 million fully diluted against a 4.3 billion total supply — the gap between the two figures is the unissued allocation the Collective still holds.
The contract posture is worth quoting exactly. Minting is still active — new supply can be minted, consistent with OP's ongoing distribution schedule. Freeze is revoked, and the code is not a proxy. Depth is the soft spot: $1000 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is thin against a nine-figure cap, and $2.8 million of 24-hour volume means ordinary exits clear but size should be measured against the pool, not the headline.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or OP?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.17B and OP (Optimism) measures $245.65M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or OP?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and OP (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and OP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.01% and OP at −23.0%.
More comparisons
WBNB vs USDTWETH vs USDTUSDT vs CBBTCUSDT vs USDSOP vs LITOP vs AKEOP vs USDT0QNT vs OP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.