HostUSDT vs ELEVATE — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs ELEVATE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-13.
USDT vs ELEVATE — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| USDT | ELEVATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.03278 |
| Market cap | $9.17B | $546.05M |
| 24h volume | $787.61M all venues | $2.74M DEX |
| Liquidity | $478.31M | $1.73M |
| FDV | $9.17B | $193.56M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 2,415 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 211 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~17× the market cap of ELEVATE
- USDT measures ~276× the liquidity of ELEVATE
- USDT measures ~288× the 24h volume of ELEVATE
- USDT measures ~33,385× the holder count of ELEVATE
- over the shared window USDT moved +0.20% while ELEVATE moved −63.7%
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $478.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
ELEVATE
Elevate is a mid-cap Ethereum token whose name carries the usual promise of its genre — the contract 0x888888888887715fb9d9f84175af9e6cce46807e is this row's identity, and our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note for this shape of asset: at this depth the page's job is the same as every ungraded-check page's — verify the contract, check the mint/freeze controls, look at the holder distribution — because a name like Elevate tells a buyer nothing about what the token actually does or who stands behind it. The figures above are what's measurable; the project's own documentation is what's not.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or ELEVATE?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.17B and ELEVATE (Ethereum) measures $546.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or ELEVATE?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and ELEVATE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and ELEVATE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.20% and ELEVATE at −63.7%.
More comparisons
WBNB vs USDTWETH vs USDTUSDT vs CBBTCUSDT vs USDSEURC vs ELEVATEELEVATE vs METHUSD0 vs ELEVATEELEVATE vs MORPHO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.