HostUSDT vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (Ethereum) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USDT vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USDT | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9958 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $127.35M | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $49.79M | $1.69B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 245 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~34× the liquidity of USDT
- CCV measures ~22× the 24h volume of USDT
What the data says
USDT
USDT is the oldest and largest dollar token on the internet — Tether's dollar, the reserve currency of offshore crypto trading since 2014, and the settlement asset most of the industry's volume clears in. The contract at 0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c13d831ec7 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $49.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is only what our sampler sees — USDT's real depth spans dozens of venues and most of it sits in order books and OTC desks our pool read does not enumerate.
The honest complications are the well-known ones. Tether's attestations are not a full audit, its reserves have historically included things beyond cash, and the contract itself retains freeze and blacklist controls — a stablecoin where the issuer can seize a balance is a different instrument than one that cannot. None of this is new or disqualifying; it is the price of the deepest dollar liquidity in crypto, and the reason the scan above reports what it reports.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered NexFlow's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or CCV?
By tracked market cap: USDT (Ethereum) measures — and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (Ethereum) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USDT at +0.04% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDT vs RYYUSDT vs FKBUSDT vs CRDUSDT vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.